Chapter 5 -
Addictions: Life Behind the Wall (Part 1)


Much of the story of a man
trying to separate from the mother object involves the story of a
man fighting addictions. Addictions are like an emotional umbilicus,
connecting a man to a mother object and tricking the boy inside into
believing he needs a mother for existence itself. The trouble is the
umbilicus is emotional and invisible and the dark Mother weaves her
spell of unconsciousness to keep it that way.
George
Santana once said that he didn't know who first discovered water,
but he did know it wasn't a fish. We are an addictive society. It is
hard for a man to recognize his addictions in the sea of
addictiveness around him. Addictions keeps a man artificially
connected to a ready source of numbness at the very time he needs to
face initiatory pain. Addiction is like pain insurance and a policy
comes very cheap in our society.
Most
men do not realize the myriad ways they are addicted or what the
addiction is doing to them. Like Ed in the last chapter, addicted
men do not see the futility of their lives. Of course the more
obvious substance addictions, such as alcohol and drug abuse, are
recognized when they cause serious harm to a man's reputation or
career. Alcohol or drug abuse can also become obvious when it leads
to domestic violence involving a spouse, lover, or child. A man who
has multiple D.U.I.'s sticks out as someone having a problem.
However, when serious addictions pop out publicly they are often
seen as aberrations, the sins of some "sick" men. The man addicted
to work, sex, rage, money is seen more as macho than addicted. The
models of manhood in our society are models of addicted men. The
training manual teaches addiction. There is little social awareness
that addicted men are still in their boy stage emotionally.
The
occurrence of the emotionally regressed, addicted man as a cultural
ideal is unsuspected. We don't recognize the disease much less the
major symptom. Men are taught in our society to be boys and to revel
addictively in that boyness. That we label manhood. When watching
old movies, especially old detective flicks, notice how strange it
seems today to see so many people lighting up at every opportunity.
The ubiquitious haze gave an atmosphere of mystery. Nobody
questioned the addiction or the secondary smoke dangers. Only today
does the addiction seem obvious.
The Desperate Boy
Most often when a man comes into my office after
suffering a sudden separation from a mother object he will report
that he got drunk. It is considered manly and forgivable in our
society to get drunk and out of control because of love gone wrong.
Somehow it proves the depth of love instead of the depth of
dependence.
This
kind of addictive behavior seems to be the universal reaction to a
modern man in deep pain. I can always spot an addicted man when his
first goal when entering my office is to get rid of the pain. I
don't blame a man for wanting to eradicate the searing pain as
quickly as possible. He has not been taught how to handle it any
other way.
Most
men will struggle their whole lives against regression to a passive,
painless place which is the world of the young boy and the dark
mother. Think of a young child around 6 years old. For this is the
boy inside that we need to deal with when understanding most
addictions.
Any boy
this young has little experience in changing the world about him to
get his needs met. For example, if a parent chooses not to feed him
at a time he is hungry, he has few choices. He can cry, throw a
tantrum, make a nuisance of himself. He has no job, no access to
money, no ability to barter, no leverage. He must ultimately wait
until he gets the food he needs, usually from his mother. He depends
on her to make him feel better again. He depends on her to take away
the hunger pangs. He is powerless in substantial, survival ways.
When a
man first experiences the threat of separation his first reaction
will be anger, just like the little boy throwing a tantrum. If he
becomes desperate, he will move from anger to rage. Then he is
moving into the area of addiction. Unresolved anger is most often a
man's gateway to addictions. Unresolved separation is most often the
cause.
The
painful feeling of powerlessness is the catalyst. A raging man is a
man gripped by impotence. A man's threatened separation from a
mother object is usually his first conscious experience of
powerlessness, and the cause of his deepest pain. As Robert Johnson
says, "Most dark moods in a man are his mother complex coming to the
surface." The childs' feeling of powerlessness within a man's strong
body then leads to a dangerous situation.
Men
have two unhealthy ways to deal with their inevitable anger at
feeling separated. A man can act out the rage, using addictive rage
to try to bully a situation, stop a separation, and soothe himself
with false bravado. Or he can medicate his rage with other
addictions, hiding depressively behind his walls.
Rage
Anger is a natural emotion, even healthy. A man often needs
anger to start setting healthy boundaries. Rage, on the other hand,
is learned and unhealthy. Rage is unconscious, uncontrolled anger.
Most often a man will learn rage from his father or the patriarchal
society around him. He will learn that rage can control those around
him and lessen the feeling of powerlesness. He will also learn
another patriarchal secret. Rage is actually soothing to the boy
inside. It actually takes away the pain.
Most
people would judge a raging man as being in great pain. Extreme,
negative emotion leads one to believe that something is terrribly
wrong within the rager. Yes, there is something wrong, but the
enraged man is not feeling it. He is actually, at that moment,
medicating his pain.
Bessel
Van Der Kolk, a trauma researcher, has shown that the body releases
opioid substances, called endorphins, into the system when the
"fight or flight"
response is triggered. Rage can trigger this response and release
the narcotic-like chemicals that then wash the body. Van Der Kolk
hypothesizes that people can get addicted to this cycle of rage and
release just as if they found a drug to take. The narcotic release
is soothing and numbing.
Most
men in our society are taught to use rage for soothing and control.
The soothing is physiological, the sense of control a way to handle
feelings of impotence. Men then become addicted to the results. The
uninitiated man will always see his rage as justified. He will feel
righteous in being angry. The dark mother, the mother complex, will
convince him he deserves to be angry, while keeping him unconscious
of his own part in his problem. He will then have the addiction to
treat his pain and the means to rationalize his control. And he will
have no motivation to separate.
Rage is
similar to the uncontrolled, mercenary samurai warrior who has no
lord and no bushido. Anger is the healthy emotion of the good
warrior, who uses anger to set boundaries and then experience the
pain of initiation. Rage is the emotion of the dark, mercenary
warrior who is afraid of initiation and would rather cause pain than
experience it.
All men
in our culture have been issued an emotional funnel by a patriarchy
of dark warriors. This is the only tool issued to deal with painful,
powerless, fearful feelings. This tool funnels all these
uncomfortable feelings into rage, like the explosion of a bullet is
funneled through the barrel of a gun. Since most men are permitted
to let their anger move to rage, the country is full of dangerous
men.
I have
worked with many men who were rageaholics. This spectrum of anger
addiction can go from the physically and emotionally abusive to the
chronically irritable and depressed. Since this addiction is so
widespread and common most men are surprised, sometimes shocked, to
hear how loved ones describe their anger.
For
example, I talked to one man, Harry, who was married for 25 years.
He was mild-mannered in my office, if not depressed. His wife had
just left him. In trying to help her husband she called me to
describe the reasons she left. She described Harry as being often
angry and irritable throughout their marriage. He would spoil most
social situations for her, especially with family, because of his
short, sarcastic tone. He would often be irritated with the behavior
of his children or the lack of order in the house, creating a tense
atmosphere in the home.
When I
confronted Harry with this feedback he was totally surprised. He had
no idea he had been angry most of his life or that it was driving
his wife away. He didn't realize that he had been using his anger to
medicate his pain and his depression. He didnŐt realize he was in
the grips of his mother complex.
Tim
Other men know they are angry but don't know why or what to do about
it. Tim, came to counseling because his wife threatened to leave him
if he didn't seek professional help. His wife complained about Tim's
anger with her and her children. Tim was an executive with a quiet
manner and a likable personality. He didn't like his anger.
Tim and
Rae came from different towns in a rural area. They met in high
school and dated until graduation. After graduation they married.
One of their attractions for each other was their shared ambition to
rise above the area they lived in and become successes.
Rae
supported Tim financially and emotionally as he went through
college. Upon graduation they were able to move to a metropolitan
area. Tim was proud of a new job in a large corporation. He had made
the big time. Rae, who had never seen a dishwasher before, was very
happy in a new apartment meeting new, interesting friends.
Rae was
then able to go to college, herself, and become a nurse. Since Rae
was very religious her new job not only provided financially, but it
allowed her to give to others and to show her Christian caring. Tim
described a good relationship with this wife, Rae, for the first six
years. Each was enjoying their work, their new, cosmopolitan
experiences, and each other.
At that
point Rae wanted children. Tim was shocked. He was enjoying his life
and his wife. He had everything he had ever wanted. He was living
his adolescent dreams. He was the star player living the rest of his
life with the prettiest cheerleader. Tim was not ready for the idea
of fatherhood.
His own
father had to give up his professional dreams because of a family
death. His father had become stuck in the small town that Tim needed
to leave. Tim's father was a depressed and frustrated man because he
knew his unused potential. His father was also an angry man, when he
didn't withdraw to his newspaper. Tim didn't know it at the time,
but Rae's mention of children brought his father's painful life
parallel with his own. Tim unconsciously imagined himself trapped by
family responsibility into the pale, numbing, depressed life of his
father. Tim started to feel the pain of his father wound. He started
to feel both the powerlessness and the anger of his own father.
Tim
also worried that a child would take Rae's attention away from their
relationship. Rae had taken care of him through college. Rae had
waited for him to come home from trips. Rae was there for him
always. Rae was a mother object in a happy home, as opposed to the
depressed mother in the home he grew up in. As happens to a lot of
childhood deprived men, a child was a threat to Tim. A child would
take away his mother object.
Rae was
insistent on a child. Tim finally agreed. He was afraid to alienate
Rae by refusing. When the child came the relationship did
deteriorate. Rae was a good mother and found much emotional
fulfillment there. Tim felt left out. He was no longer the center of
Rae's life. He also felt himself resenting their child, Mary, and
ignoring her. Rae became angry at Tim for "not being a good father."
She did not realize how she had totally identified with the mother
archetype, after the birth of their child, and had left little
emotion for her husband. With this change in identification, she
wanted a father for her children above everything else.
Her
anger at his lack of paternal feeling became a major wedge between
them. Tim became more and more depressed throughout the marriage,
not understanding his feelings of abandonment. The boy inside became
more and more angry at the abandonment. Tim started to use his anger
to get Rae to agree with him. He threw tantrums to control her and
get her attention. Somehow that made him feel closer to her.
However, his anger only estranged Rae more.
He
became angry at both Rae and Mary, and eventually a new son, without
knowing why. He couldn't understand why his feelings funneled into
anger. He did have feelings of love for all three. He knew he
enjoyed some parts of family life. He was also doing very well in
his career and was proud of it.
The
couple spent most of the rest of their marriage living parallel
lives, Rae as mother and Tim as father-provider. As the children
grew older Rae spent more time doing good works with her church, as
well as working and keeping a household. Tim continued to feel left
out even as the children needed less of Rae's time. As Tim said
during counseling, "I get angry at Rae because she gives attention
to everything else but me."
Tim was
desperately frustrated by a mother object. He was unaware of that
need. He yearned for nurturing as his only hope for happiness. He
could see no way out, no other way to happiness. He felt powerless
to get the happiness he wanted.Tim used anger, as well as work, to
numb himself. He also used anger to get Rae to do his bidding and
respect his wishes. Then he would feel some connection to her. Tim
used anger in a way he learned from his father. It did help to numb,
at times. It did help to control, at times, and make him feel more
powerful. It didn't help him to find any other way to connect to
Rae.
He was
stuck in his father's tragic way, behind a wall, behind the
newspaper. Tim did not like being seen as angry. He did not want to
be an angry man. He wanted a cure for his anger. He wanted some
peace in his personal life and in his family life. I started to talk
to him of mother objects, numbing, separation, boundaries, and the
father wound. He was desparate. He started to listen.
Tim is
an example of those men who are depressed and controlling. They
mostly withdraw with occasional outbursts of rage and verbal abuse.
They are on the less destructive side of rageful men, though their
rage does sometimes spill over into violence. They are often open to
the idea of counseling if it is portrayed properly. They are ashamed
of their behavior and need the guidance to find other ways to funnel
their anger. They need to find ways to separate from their mother
needs and their father's scripts.
Pit Bulls
Other men use rage consistently to bully. They are on the
most destructive side of the spectrum of rageful men. They learn
rage as a way of keeping a mother object close and pliable. They
rage or threaten rage as a means of control. These are abusive men
who threaten physical violence when a loved one is not totally
absorbed in them. They will systematically cut off their spouse from
any meaningful relationship outside the connection to them. They
must either feel physically close or be able to know their loved one
is at home.
I have
few stories about them because they rarely come to counseling
voluntarily. They are usually ordered to counseling by the court
system. John Gottman, a research psychologist, has studied a sample
of spouse batterers for ten years. In the process he has monitored
the physiological responses of these men as they got into
controlled, nonviolent arguments with their spouses in their lab.
First
of all he found that a sizable number of couples, identified as
violent, were like Tim and Rae. The men were not consistently
domineering and the women were not cowering under their domination.
There were occasional outbursts that included pushing and shoving
that didn't escalate into violence. These couples were considered
good candidates for counseling.
However, the rest of the group were composed of men whom Gottman
felt were dangerous. He felt they should not be involved in couples
counseling. In measuring their physiological responses he found that
80% of these men exprienced the physiological arousal associated
with anger: faster heart rate, increased perspiration, higher blood
pressure. These were men accustomed to rage.
He
labeled these men Pit Bulls because of their over attachment to
their spouses. Gottman found that Pit Bulls "are strongly atached to
their partners, albeit in overly dependent and controlling ways, and
use violence to prevent abandonment." These men did feel shame about
what they have done to their partners, after the fact. But even
after separation, they could become violent again if attempts at
reconciliation were thwarted. These men consistently used violence,
or the threat of violence, to keep their spouse close and
controlled. These desperate men could not face mother separation.
Pit
bulls are little boys in men's bodies, who use their masculine
muscle to keep from feeling like an orphan. These men use their rage
to keep from feeling the pain of aloneness and neglect. Few people
realize how desperately these men need to rage to keep from feeling
the deep pain of the lost, powerless child. These men rage to numb
on a consistent basis. They are terrified of separation. They are
society's most destructive addicts. They are society's most
dangerous men.
More Mothering?
Some psychologists would say that these men, as well as other
rageaholics, need more mothering to heal their deep wounds. They
would insist that these men are not ready for separation or donŐt
need separation at all.
Yet,
most of these men are already attached to women who are
understanding and nurturing. Most abusive men will choose dependent,
nurturing women as spouses. These spouses will put up with most
anything to keep the relationship going. They will give till it
hurts. They will keep going back to be hurt. They overmother like
the dark mother. And their husbands stay emotional little boys, or
High Chair Tyrants, as Moore and Gillette put it.
Gottman
says it is dangerous to the woman to be in counseling with many
serious rageaholics and batterers. Trying for understanding will be
counterproductive. The only hope for these men is for someone to
empower their wives to stop mothering. Empowerment will give a
mother object the strength to stop being a mother object. The
resulting separation will either force a man to deal with his
emotional crisis, through fathering and eldering, or force him to
retreat to another mother object. Either way, at least the empowered
woman will be safe. And the man will be given his best shot at
healing and maturity.
A man
who separates psychologically from a mother object moves to the
world of the father. Here, too, he will be tempted to rage as a way
of dealing with his powerless feelings in the marketplace. However,
his mother separation will provide a strong foundation for dealing
with these feelings. Fathering and eldering will then lead him to
the place of initiation, where he will learn initiatory humility as
the answer to his questions about power.
The
crisis of mother separation is the only way out for men stuck in
their rage. For the man who does move to another mother object, his
path is often a deeper retreat behind walls. This is often the
retreat to a substance, a mother object that will never get
empowered and leave.
Larry Pesavento and MENSIGHT ask you to
submit suggestions and discuss your opinions on our
Men's Issues Forum.

Larry Pesavento ©2004